Metallic Painting of Water Damaged Primary

Here is a photo of the water damaged primary before painting.  The perimeter of this dish has a piece of masking tape with the label “NO 9” which to me implies S/N 09.  This tape is obscured by the baffle when installed.

Water damaged dish

March 19: Adam prepared the surface by wiping down with isopropyl alcohol then we gave it 5 coats of the metallic paint.

Application of metallic paint onto primary

Here is how the dish appeared afterward application of 5 coats of metallic paint (before sanding).

After application of 5 coats of metallic paint

March 25 –  I went to sand and measure the resistance of the dish surface and found the readings to be quite high ranging from 100 to 150 Ohms near the center and varying from a few Ohms to 75 Ohms along the perimeter.  It seems that we held the spray can too far away from the dish for the center portion resulting in a coating that was either thin or the paint dried before hitting the surface.  So I applied 4 more coats of paint but this time made sure I maintained equidistance to the surface while spraying.

After 4 additional coats of metallic paint
Dish S/N label

March 29 – After waiting over a long weekend I dry sanded the dish using the same 600 grit sand paper.  Brushed off the grit and touched up areas that felt rough by hand.

Dry sanding with 600 grit paper
After 4 additional coats of metallic paint and sanding

The DC resistance measurements now show good results of 0.5 to 1.0 Ohms between any two measured points on the dish.  I measure both before and after sanding with the same results.  Spacing the contact probes across the entire dish (edge to edge) resulted in the same low resistance values.  So it appears that the coating is quite uniform in conductivity.

DC resistance measurements

Here is a link to the painting of the secondary reflector for the same dish assembly.  http://amibablog.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/?p=25963

-Derek

February 2021 Tracking SEFD

Below are renormalized SEFD, including Rx6 (see Kyle’s post here: http://amibablog.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/?p=25893), using Mars tracking data from February.

Some Notes:

  • For all observations, Rx1 secondary mirror was coated with aluminum spray, and Rx6 secondary was foil-covered.
  • 2/6: Rx2 not in use.
  • 2/11: Rx5 not in use.
  • 2/19: very hazy sky, brief (10 min.) observation.

X-Pol:

Y-Pol:

 

-Casandra

January 2021 Tracking SEFD

Below are renormalized SEFD, including Rx6 (see Kyle’s post here: http://amibablog.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/?p=25893), using Mars tracking data from January. Note that Rx1 and Rx6 secondary mirrors were foil-covered for all observations and that Rx1 was not in use on the 28th or 30th.

X-Pol:

Y-Pol:

 

-Casandra

Al foil vs. Al spray paint reflectivity on glass vs. frequency

This is a follow up on the measurements that was done about a week ago. Please look the this blogpost for detailed setup photos and 80 GHz measurements. http://amibablog.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/?p=25911
The only difference in the setup was the use of the E8257D synthesizer to provide us with the modulation RF tone into the laser synthesizer to produce a final CW output of 80, 85, 90, 95 and 100 GHz, instead of the NI tone source.

Sally and I finished up doing reflectivity measurements across a few frequencies in W band. The measurements are recorded in this spreadsheet.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/188dbx821ZhO2_kJgqRfGAZfjMbheSgiORJBOYts1AaE/edit?ts=600f58e7#gid=0

The small drop in reflection for most of the frequencies is consistent with the previous measurement.

In summary, the reflectivity with the “almost” conductive Al spray paint is almost identical to the Al foil across W band.

Sally, Ranjani